Mr. Gahan’s “Blue” Problem

Posted: October 29, 2015 by newalbanist in Uncategorized

Floating just under the penetrative waves of the political radar over the past 4 years has been a deep and abiding morale problem among New Albany’s Finest, our men and women in blue. At the senior command level, all is well, as evidenced by the active campaigning and generous campaign contributions from the chief and deputy chief. But in the ranks, there’s a nasty smell.


Personally, I believe an Indiana mayor has no business being in an adversarial relationship with the law enforcement officers he employs. However, the long-standing abdication of duty by multiple city councils has brought us to a state where our mayor is not advocating for our police officers but, rather, harshly working to diminish their job satisfaction. But that’s beside the current point.

In order to give broader coverage to their plaint, I’m republishing the text of a newspaper advertisement placed this week by the Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge 99. And yes, I’m doing so because I believe the safety and well-being of this city depend on Jeff Gahan being retired from public office. Indeed, I am continually amused that so many feign outrage that a blog, a Facebook post, or a Tweet might contain an actual wish that the writer’s preferred candidate be elected and that the incumbent be retired. City employees and appointees and the mayor’s family members seem to think that electoral politics requires silence about the issues and deference to their chosen one.

Enough. Here is the text of the relevant open letter to the voters:

As president of the Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge 99, I have been asked to express the Lodge’s absolute and unequivocal anger at the lack of respect shown to the Officers and Members of the F.O.P. by the current Mayor Gahan. Since he took office, the mayor has gone out of his way to ignore his lawful obligations to or with us.

Mayor Gahan began by refusing to sign a contract agreed to by Mayor England, resulting in a totally unnecessary arbitration and expensive litigation for the City. Inexplicably, more recently, he failed to present an Arbitration Award rendered in May of this year to the City Council. When I talked about the Award with the City Council at its regular meeting on September 2, 2015, the members were shocked that the financial information, so necessary to its budgeting process, had been knowingly withheld from the Council. (In retrospect, this was a harbinger of things to come. The County Council has had to sue the Mayor to get financial information it believes necessary to do its job.)

It appears that the latest refusal to abide by a lawful Arbitrator’s Award, as required by local ordinance, will again result in costing the City needless litigation expenses.

The position of Mayor Gahan in ignoring his obligations under local ordinance is the most arrogant display of disrespect possible: ignore your lawful obligations then compound it by needlessly spending City revenue to defend your unlawful actions, again, with out-of-town lawyers.

This disrespect is not reserved for the F.O.P. It is visited on individual members in a variety of ways. For instance, early in his Administration, an Officer reached his mandatory retirement age. He was a Navy veteran with 40 years of service to the City. Rather than telling him well in advance that he was going to be forced into retirement, the Officer was called in at the end of his shift and told he was retired. No advance notice, no time for him to prepare for his sudden unemployment, and a practice not theretofore implemented by any other Administrator.

In a similar incident, the Mayor vehemently opposed the return to work of an Officer, and a U.S. Marine veteran. who was cleared by three separate physicians to do so, two of which were the City’s physicians. Fortunately, the Merit Commission restored the Officer to his employment.

It appears that Gahan has not learned a life lesson that people may not remember what you said to them, but they will always remember how you made them feel. He has apparently made it his goal to make every Officer feel disrespected.

Each day, when a member of the New Albany Police Department put on his/her uniform and badge and walks out the door to work, they are saying to the citizens of New Albany “we’ve got your back.” The time has come for this Mayor to discontinue his campaign of disrespect. He can do that by simply abiding by all Arbitrator’s Awards for all public safety employees, as the law requires.

We appreciate the support we have had from the citizens of New Albany and wish we could get the same from Mayor Gahan.

President, Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge 99



Image  —  Posted: October 23, 2015 by newalbanist in Uncategorized

We’re deep into the primary campaigning season and New Albany voters are preparing to elect a mayor and nine council members.


Quite a few of the incumbents, including Mayor Jeff “M” Gahan, are boasting about the state of our sewer system (Gahan is also the paid president of the city-owned municipal utility).

But it turns out that our elected officials have resumed an illegal shell game with taxpayer money once again being used to disguise the true state of the utility’s finances.

Just four years ago I asked voters in New Albany’s Fifth Council District to elect me. During that campaign, I pleaded with Gahan to promise to end that subsidy. He denied it was illegal and declined to make such a pledge.

I had thought the chicanery had finally ended when I read last year that the subsidy had been removed. But just to make sure, I perused the city’s 2015 budget. There, to my astonishment, was yet another transfer of $570,000 from the income tax fund (EDIT) to the sewer utility.

RBFM Illegal

I have written at length in the past about the illegality of this transfer. To be brief, while a city in Indiana can own and operate a municipal utility, the finances of that utility must be completely separated from other city funds. That is, the utility must stand on its own, without subsidies of any kind.

With this budget year, Jeff Gahan has in 11 budget years (as a councilman and as mayor) approved more than $10 million in transfers from city taxes to prop up the utility.

One might be of the opinion that using tax dollars to fortify the sewers is a good thing, but none of us are entitled to an opinion on this matter. State law is extremely clear. It’s illegal. (It happens to be illegal in Louisville, too, under a different state’s laws – ref: MSD.)

This misfeasance on the part of the mayor and council subjects the utility itself to the jeopardy of a taxpayer lawsuit to recover these millions of dollars.

RBFM Foolish

However, illegality has become normal in New Albany. It’s not just the law-breaking that New Albany voters need to be aware of as they go to the polls. This transfer is possibly the single dumbest way to divert tax money and demonstrates innumeracy and financial incompetence on the part of the mayor and his advisors.

Let’s do a little simple arithmetic. It takes a few steps to show that this is a foolish way to spend.

The local income tax is split equally between Floyd County and the City of New Albany. It taxes the incomes of people who work here and/or who live here. If you work outside the county, you may also pay income taxes there, but adjustments level out.

Today, New Albany takes in just less than $3 million each year from the income tax. Over the 12 years Gahan has been an officeholder, more than $10 million dollars has been illegally diverted. This year, they’ve allocated slightly less than 20% of all EDIT collections to be able to say the city utility is “financially sound.”

Every dime sent to the sewer utillity is a dime that could have been used to pave roads, hire more cops, or address any of the crying needs of New Albany. If you work, here’s roughly how much of what you paid has been going to keep sewer rates artificially low:


Let’s take a relatively low number like $30,000. That household pays about $65 a year so that sewer rates can be subsidized. The largest subsidies, of course, go to the largest users – industries and orthers who use large amounts of water each month.

RBFM Sewer Rate

Assuming they use 3 units each month, their monthly bill is about $22.50. Over the course of a year, they will pay $270 to the municipal sewer utility. To maintain that rate, though, that same household pays $65, or rather, fails to receive $65 in city services like code enforcement, law enforcement, emergency and fire response, paving, etc.

So if it’s costing that household $65 today, how much would it cost to remove that subsidy? You might be shocked to learn just how much money is being stolen from the city’s general fund – at a cost of more than a half-million dollars in lost city services.

RBFM Sewer Rational

Which would you rather pay to the sewer utility? $335 or $281?

RBFM Sewer Wasted

One-Way Streets Are a Disease

Posted: April 19, 2015 by NewAlbanyBooks in Uncategorized

Originally posted on The NewAlbanist:

Think of New Albany as you would a human body. As much as we might like for it to be restored to its prime of life, there are physical aspects of the city we cannot control or change. A city does age.

But like a man or a woman in maturity, New Albany might just want to forestall the aging.

Humans die. Cities, properly managed, do not.

One way streets are an infectious disease being treated as if it were a chronic condition.

One-Way Streets Are Not a Chronic Condition

The American Diabetes Association tells us that 25.8 million Americans have diabetes and that another 79 million are prediabetic. Diabetics are 2 to 4 times more likely than nondiabetics to suffer a stroke or have heart disease. The #1 myth about diabetes is that it is not that serious of a disease. ” If you manage your diabetes properly, you can…

View original 763 more words

Originally posted on The NewAlbanist:

I understand that some readers can still say of New Albany Mayor Jeff Gahan that “He’s my guy.” I only ask, “Why?”


Almost from the moment I arrived in this city, I’ve pushed, prodded, and pleaded for city officials to pay some attention to our broken streets, most often in the downtown area, but elsewhere, as well. At first, my quest was relatively simplistic. I asked why we couldn’t change our one-way streets back to the two-way traffic patterns they were designed for. As the years passed and I educated myself and others, “my” quest became “our” quest and our petitions to our elected officials metamorphosed from simplistic to sophisticated, though no less simple to accomplish.

This is my 11th year working on this. Coincidentally, this is Mayor Gahan’s 12th year as an elected official. These were years where he could have educated himself and perhaps even become a champion for…

View original 1,086 more words

I understand that some readers can still say of New Albany Mayor Jeff Gahan that “He’s my guy.” I only ask, “Why?”


Almost from the moment I arrived in this city, I’ve pushed, prodded, and pleaded for city officials to pay some attention to our broken streets, most often in the downtown area, but elsewhere, as well. At first, my quest was relatively simplistic. I asked why we couldn’t change our one-way streets back to the two-way traffic patterns they were designed for. As the years passed and I educated myself and others, “my” quest became “our” quest and our petitions to our elected officials metamorphosed from simplistic to sophisticated, though no less simple to accomplish.

This is my 11th year working on this. Coincidentally, this is Mayor Gahan’s 12th year as an elected official. These were years where he could have educated himself and perhaps even become a champion for our cause. After 8 years as a city council member, Gahan put himself forward to serve as the city’s executive. Many of you voted for him. All of you believed Mr. Gahan when he said he supported two-way streets.

Today, we have available to us a comprehensive street design program that is, as they say, shovel-ready. Prepared by Jeff Speck, the most prominent city planning professional in this country, and his team, the program is elegant, simple, and inexpensive to implement. Whether you read the 60-page justification or the 40-page section-by-section program for street change, you are likely to feel your heart leap while imagining the probable outcomes if New Albany embraces the program.

Read the report here

Yet, as recently as this past weekend, the mayor said to the News and Tribune that he “want[s] to emphasize this is just a study.” (emphasis mine)

Rather than embracing this opportunity, this mayor is pre-emptively knee-capping it. He is unwilling to claim it as his own. He is unwilling to step out in public and say “This is what I want to do. I believe it’s in the best interests of this community. And here’s why.”

Granted, he’s not the first mayor to shy away from making what I believe could be the greatest leap forward imaginable for New Albany’s revitalization. Each of the past two mayors said they were for it, that it was a figurative no-brainer. This mayor told two-way supporters that he, too, favored it.

Yet now, when a plan is fully laid-out for him, he waffles. He will not claim it. He will not implement it. He now won’t even say he favors it.

Draw your own conclusions as to why. Draw your own conclusions about the mayor’s integrity, intelligence, and fortitude.

You might have noticed that I have personally been quieter than usual about this issue in the past year. There was a reason. In our family, we’ve been heeding the professional advice of Jeff Speck and his like-minded colleagues for years. With the publication of Speck’s Walkable City: How Downtown Can Save America, One Step at a Time, we found a concise vision of what it is we want to (and need to) accomplish.

Last January (2014) when, miraculum miraculorum, the city invited Speck to speak to us and then, Deo Patri sit gloria, a city board actually contracted with his firm, I placed an embargo on my own advocacy. I was (and am) perfectly willing to let Speck speak for me, whatever the consequences. Though I could have, I didn’t even speak to Jeff during his site visits and I did not share with him any insights on what I thought ought to be done.

The program presented by Speck is, as I’ve said, elegant, simple, and inexpensive.

The critical “pull quote” in the report appears in Speck’s Executive Summary. One would think that everyone with any interest or opinion on the matters would at least read that 3-page preface.

What Speck said was this:

If the principal purpose of the City’s downtown street network is the vitality of New Albany, then the choice is clear.

It is.

For that reason, I will no longer accept the duty of advocating for these changes. The choice here is clear. The mayor either will or will not accept his duty. There is no gray area here. I will not participate in the fraud of the Gahan administration pretending to support the Speck Plan for one audience while pandering to another audience by assuring them that it is “just a study.”

I did not and will not support Mr. Gahan’s political campaign. I’ve made my choice for mayor and am confident that my choice will implement the Speck Plan without dithering, without subterfuge, and without hypocrisy.

There is simply no excuse, even at this very late date, for anyone to allow Jeff Gahan to now, in an election year, play Hamlet. I would be very interested to know if any of us who have called for these changes for years have been approached by Gahan or his minions to “rally the troops” and thus give the mayor political cover. I did not sign up to work for the mayor’s re-election campaign. Whether the support for the Speck Plan polls at 9% in favor or 90% in favor, the choice is clear.

Now, the man I will work to get elected mayor publicly disagrees with my personal choice here. Roger Baylor, at his NA Confidential blog, decries the necessity for public assemblies and other such political theater, but says “we must outwork both whacked-out opponents and city hall.”

Roger, I say we must not.

Jeff Gahan, I say this one’s on you. You must say “I was wrong. I’m sorry. I’ll fix it.”

As a philosopher from a galaxy a long time ago and far, far away once said: “Try not. Do, or do not. There is no try.”

Were I able to attend John Smith’s strategy session for the Facebook group Two-Way Streets Now!, scheduled for Wednesday, Jan. 21, at 7 p.m. in the Sew Fitting store on Main Street, this is what I would say: Friends (and former friends), please attend the public information sessions planned for Thursday, January 29, 6:00 – 7:30 p.m. at the New Albany-Floyd County Public Library (180 W. Spring St.; Strassweg Auditorium); Saturday, February 21, 10:30 a.m. – Noon at the Carnegie Center (201 E. Spring St.); and/or Wednesday, March 18, 6:00 – 7:30 p.m. at the Pepin Mansion on Main Street (1003 E. Main St.)

Learn. See. But refrain from campaigning for the adoption of the Speck Plan. That is now Jeff Gahan’s job. You may or may not be happy with this mayor. You may actually be part of this mayor’s campaign team. You may trust him. But it seems clear to me that nothing will be done in 2015 by this mayor to implement the Speck Plan. Let the mayor and his campaign team now take up the torch and tell us not only that they support it, but why, and why it is an opportunity we must seize now and not after this year’s primary and general elections.

That is, after all, his freakin’ job.

Mr. Gahan has already botched it with the Speck Plan. I won’t work to excuse his 11 years of inactivity on this front nor forgive his hypocrisy in saying one thing to one person and another to another. Jeff, son … we’re going to have to let you go.

Our Mission is to Plant Ourselves at the Gates of Hope

Posted: December 12, 2014 by NewAlbanyBooks in Uncategorized
Tags: ,

gates of hope

On this chilly Friday in December, my thoughts wander to friends out there who are beset by doubts and fears, by crises and catastrophes, and who are struggling to find meaning in it all.

I keep this posted beside my desk. It is a meditation by Victoria Safford, to whom all credit should be given. Ponder and enjoy.

Our Mission is to plant ourselves at the gates of hope – not the prudent gates of Optimism, which are somewhat narrower; nor the stalwart, boring gates of Common Sense; nor the strident gates of self-righteousness … nor the cheerful, flimsy garden gate of ‘Everything is gonna be all right,’ but a very different, sometimes very lonely place, the place of truth-telling, about your own soul first of all and its condition, the place of resistance and defiance, the piece of ground from which you see the world both as it is and as it could be, as it might be, as it will be; the place from which you glimpse not only struggle, but joy in the struggle – and we stand there, beckoning and calling, telling people what we are seeing, asking people what they see.

May you all have peace and joy in this season.

The Rev. Victoria Safford is minister of the White Bear Unitarian Universalist Church in Mahtomedi, Minnesota. She is the author ofWalking Toward Morning: Meditations (Skinner House, 2003) and a contributor to The Impossible Will Take a Little While: A Citizen’s Guide to Hope in a Time of Fear (Basic Books, 2004).