Reactions to my call to slow down the race to build a new outdoor swimming pool have been encouraging, to say the least.*
On council member who was wrongly believed to have harkened to the “all aboard” call has corrected that misimpression, telling us he is withholding judgment for the time being. That, my friends, is precisely what I’m calling for.
Some smart people have provided me with additional talking points in support of my recent blog post. But then, I would consider people who support my suggestion to be smart, wouldn’t I?
And that puts a fine edge on the point of my previous post, which was amplified Monday when the News-Tribune published it as a guest column.
It is that willingness to listen to people who agree with me that I see in the Gahan administration’s push for a new pool now.
Among my personal acquaintances, N-T columnist Matt Nash has been the most vocal in insisting that New Albany should place a high priority on a new swimming pool. Nash was and is an ardent supporter of Gahan. His father, Warren, a former mayor himself, is the current mayor’s closest political advisor and sits on the all-powerful Board of Public Works and Safety.
Of course Mr. Gahan is going to listen to his political supporters – the Nashes included – but that does not mean that he or they are right.
It’s time for transparency. It’s time for discussion. Without that, I fear, as I previously stated, that we’ll awaken to a new reality before the citizenry has even begun to consider what’s best for New Albany and its residents.
The experiences of other cities are relevant here. I’ve asked the local newspaper to examine the economics of the pools in neighboring Clarksville and Jeffersonville and report on them as part of its editorial push in support of the Gahan project. They, frankly, have more time and tools to do that than I do.
I’m researching alternatives and will be reporting on that shortly, but in the meantime, here are a few bullet points which we all should be able and willing to debate.
PROPOSITION: There is no discernible demand for a new outdoor swimming pool. A key piece of evidence is the below-marginal use of the now-closed Camille Wright city pool in its last 20 years of operation.
PROPOSITION: Families today do not desire to use a community pool, but if they do, they are not willing, as taxpayers, to pay the public costs of building, maintaining, and operating such a facility.
PROPOSITION: With the advent of year-round school in the local public system, an expensive public pool facility would see even less use than the old pool did during the relevant season. A 4- to 6-week pool season would hardly justify the expense of an outdoor pool.
PROPOSITION: With an admission price of $6 a day per person and the requirement that an adult guardian accompany all minors under the age of 14, the economically disadvantaged will be unlikely to patronize the pool.
PROPOSITION: Public opinion would not rank a swimming pool as a high priority for city projects, even if the list of projects were limited to purported “quality of life” undertakings.
PROPOSITION: Spray (or splash) parks are exceedingly popular, offer affordable admission costs of from $1 to $2.50 a day, and the costs of building, maintaining, and operating them are at least an order of magnitude less costly than a traditional outdoor swimming facility.
PROPOSITION: New Albany, counter to Mr. Gahan’s suggestion, could instead build multiple spray parks, including in existing parks facilities, and provide accessibility to many more residents and visitors. Hotel tax revenues could be a primary source of funding for at least one of these parks.
Every taxpayer should examine these propositions and pick a side. If, as I suspect, most of us would endorse most or all of these propositions, then it’s incumbent upon us to make sure our representatives don’t commit resources to an outdoor swimming pool.
*The exception was an anonymous person who appears to be an ardent supporter of the mayor’s Xanadu-like “quality of life” projects, no matter what those projects might entail. This online commenter appears to believe that anyone who did not or does not praise the mayor is immediately disqualified from commenting on public issues.
The NewAlbanist 